Compare Storage
Share Comparison
| Storage | ![]() $24999 | ![]() $21990 |
|---|---|---|
Capacity Gb | 500 | 2000 |
Capacity | 500 GB | 2 TB |
Flash Type | TLC | - |
Form Factor | M.2 2280 | 3.5" |
Disk RPM | - | 5400 RPM |
Heatsink | No | No |
Bus | M.2 PCIe 3.0 x4 | SATA Gen 3 |
NVMe | Yes | No |
PCIe Standard | PCIe 3.0 | N/A |
Random I/O per Second (Read) | 480,000 | - |
Random I/O per Second (Write) | 550,000 | - |
SATA Speed | - | 6 Gb/s |
Sequential Read Speed | 3,500 MB/s | - |
Sequential Write Speed | 3,200 MB/s | - |
Storage Type | Solid State Disk | Mechanical Disk |
TDP | 6.1W | - |
Part Number | MZ-V7E500BW | WD20EFAX |
Comparison Analysis
Comparing the 970 EVO vs WD Red reveals distinct differences in their targeted use cases.
The WD Red is the more budget-friendly option, costing approximately $30 (14%) less than the 970 EVO.

