Compare Storage
Share Comparison
| Storage |  $19243 |  $24999 |
|---|---|---|
Capacity Gb | 500 | 500 |
Capacity | 500 GB | 500 GB |
Flash Type | TLC | TLC |
Form Factor | M.2 2280 | M.2 2280 |
Heatsink | No | No |
Bus | M.2 PCIe 4.0 x4 | M.2 PCIe 3.0 x4 |
NVMe | Yes | Yes |
PCIe Standard | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
Random I/O per Second (Read) | 430,000 | 480,000 |
Random I/O per Second (Write) | 630,000 | 550,000 |
Sequential Read Speed | 5,000 MB/s | 3,500 MB/s |
Sequential Write Speed | 2,500 MB/s | 3,200 MB/s |
Storage Type | Solid State Disk | Solid State Disk |
TDP | - | 6.1W |
Part Number | ZP500GM3A002 | MZ-V7E500BW |
Comparison Analysis
Comparing the FireCuda 520 vs 970 EVO reveals distinct differences in their targeted use cases.
The FireCuda 520 is the more budget-friendly option, costing approximately $58 (30%) less than the 970 EVO.