Compare Storage
Share Comparison
| Storage |  $22900 |  $24999 |
|---|---|---|
Capacity Gb | 3000 | 500 |
Capacity | 3 TB | 500 GB |
Flash Type | - | TLC |
Form Factor | 3.5" | M.2 2280 |
Disk RPM | 5400 RPM | - |
Heatsink | No | No |
Bus | SATA Gen 2 | M.2 PCIe 3.0 x4 |
NVMe | No | Yes |
PCIe Standard | N/A | PCIe 3.0 |
Random I/O per Second (Read) | - | 480,000 |
Random I/O per Second (Write) | - | 550,000 |
SATA Speed | 3 Gb/s | - |
Sequential Read Speed | - | 3,500 MB/s |
Sequential Write Speed | - | 3,200 MB/s |
Storage Type | Mechanical Disk | Solid State Disk |
TDP | - | 6.1W |
Part Number | WDBAAY0030HNC-NRSN | MZ-V7E500BW |
Comparison Analysis
Comparing the WD Green vs 970 EVO reveals distinct differences in their targeted use cases.
The WD Green is the more budget-friendly option, costing approximately $21 (9%) less than the 970 EVO.