Compare Displays
Share Comparison
| Display |  $94900 |  $90299 |
|---|---|---|
Screen Size | 32" | 27" |
Resolution | 3840x2160 | 3840x2160 |
Refresh Rate | 60Hz | 160Hz |
Response Time | 5ms | 0.5ms |
Panel Type | Mini LED IPS | Mini LED IPS |
Aspect Ratio | 16:9 | 16:9 |
Curved | No | No |
Frame Sync | - | G-Sync |
Max Brightness | 1000 nits | 1000 nits |
Total HDMI Ports | 3 | 1 |
Total DisplayPort Ports | 3 | 0 |
Color | Black | - |
FreeSync | No | Yes |
GSYNC | No | Yes |
H Resolution | 3840 | 3840 |
DisplayPort 1.2 Ports | 3 | 0 |
HDMI 2.0 Ports | 3 | 0 |
HDMI 2.1 Ports | 0 | 1 |
V Resolution | 2160 | 2160 |
Comparison Analysis
Comparing the ProArt Display PA32UCR-K vs Nitro XV275K P3 reveals distinct differences in their targeted use cases.
The Nitro XV275K P3 is the more budget-friendly option, costing approximately $46 (5%) less than the ProArt Display PA32UCR-K.
Competitive gamers may prefer the Nitro XV275K P3 for its smoother 160Hz refresh rate.