Compare Displays
Share Comparison
| Display |  $40694 |  $47300 |
|---|---|---|
Screen Size | 27" | 29.5" |
Resolution | 2560x1440 | 2560x1080 |
Refresh Rate | 75Hz | 200Hz |
Response Time | 5ms | 0ms |
Panel Type | IPS | VA |
Aspect Ratio | 16:9 | 21:9 |
Curved | No | Yes |
Frame Sync | FreeSync | FreeSync |
Max Brightness | 350 nits | 400 nits |
Total HDMI Ports | 0 | 2 |
Total DisplayPort Ports | 0 | 2 |
Color | Black | - |
FreeSync | Yes | Yes |
GSYNC | No | No |
H Resolution | 2560 | 2560 |
DisplayPort 1.2 Ports | 0 | 2 |
Ports Dvi | 1 | 0 |
HDMI 2.0 Ports | 0 | 2 |
V Resolution | 1440 | 1080 |
Comparison Analysis
Comparing the ProArt Display PA278QV vs Nitro XZ6 reveals distinct differences in their targeted use cases.
The ProArt Display PA278QV is the more budget-friendly option, costing approximately $66 (16%) less than the Nitro XZ6.
The ProArt Display PA278QV offers a 2560x1440 resolution, while the Nitro XZ6 is 2560x1080.
Competitive gamers may prefer the Nitro XZ6 for its smoother 200Hz refresh rate.