Compare Displays
Share Comparison
| Display |  $90299 |  $1,43300 |
|---|---|---|
Screen Size | 27" | 32" |
Resolution | 3840x2160 | 3840x2160 |
Refresh Rate | 160Hz | 60Hz |
Response Time | 0.5ms | 5ms |
Panel Type | Mini LED IPS | Mini LED IPS |
Aspect Ratio | 16:9 | 16:9 |
Curved | No | No |
Frame Sync | G-Sync | FreeSync |
Max Brightness | 1000 nits | 600 nits |
Total HDMI Ports | 1 | 1 |
Total DisplayPort Ports | 0 | 1 |
Color | - | Black |
FreeSync | Yes | Yes |
GSYNC | Yes | No |
H Resolution | 3840 | 3840 |
DisplayPort 1.2 Ports | 0 | 1 |
HDMI 2.0 Ports | 0 | 1 |
HDMI 2.1 Ports | 1 | 0 |
V Resolution | 2160 | 2160 |
Comparison Analysis
Comparing the Nitro XV275K P3 vs ProArt Display reveals distinct differences in their targeted use cases.
The Nitro XV275K P3 is the more budget-friendly option, costing approximately $530 (59%) less than the ProArt Display.
Competitive gamers may prefer the Nitro XV275K P3 for its smoother 160Hz refresh rate.