Compare Displays
Share Comparison
| Display | Philips $2,23380 |  $2,09999 |
|---|---|---|
Screen Size | 48.9" | 57" |
Resolution | 5120x1440 | 7680x2160 |
Refresh Rate | 240Hz | 240Hz |
Response Time | 0.03ms | 1ms |
Panel Type | QD-OLED | VA |
Aspect Ratio | 32:9 | 32:9 |
Curved | Yes | Yes |
Frame Sync | G-Sync | G-Sync |
Max Brightness | 450 nits | 1000 nits |
Total HDMI Ports | 2 | 3 |
Total DisplayPort Ports | 0 | 3 |
Color | Grey | - |
FreeSync | Yes | Yes |
GSYNC | Yes | Yes |
H Resolution | 5120 | 7680 |
Ports Displayport21 | 0 | 3 |
HDMI 2.1 Ports | 2 | 3 |
V Resolution | 1440 | 2160 |
Comparison Analysis
Comparing the Evnia 49M2C8900 vs Odyssey Neo G95NC 7680 x 2160 reveals distinct differences in their targeted use cases.
The Odyssey Neo G95NC 7680 x 2160 is the more budget-friendly option, costing approximately $134 (6%) less than the Evnia 49M2C8900.
The Evnia 49M2C8900 offers a 5120x1440 resolution, while the Odyssey Neo G95NC 7680 x 2160 is 7680x2160.