Compare Displays
Share Comparison
| Display | ![]() $39900 | KTC $27999 |
|---|---|---|
Screen Size | 35" | 32" |
Resolution | 3440x1440 | 3840x2160 |
Refresh Rate | 100Hz | 60Hz |
Response Time | 5ms | 1ms |
Panel Type | VA | VA |
Aspect Ratio | 21:9 | 16:9 |
Curved | Yes | No |
Frame Sync | FreeSync | - |
Max Brightness | 300 nits | 300 nits |
Total HDMI Ports | 0 | 1 |
Color | Black | Grey |
FreeSync | Yes | No |
GSYNC | No | No |
H Resolution | 3440 | 3840 |
HDMI 2.1 Ports | 0 | 1 |
V Resolution | 1440 | 2160 |
Comparison Analysis
Comparing the 35WN65C-B vs A32Q8 reveals distinct differences in their targeted use cases.
The A32Q8 is the more budget-friendly option, costing approximately $119 (43%) less than the 35WN65C-B.
The 35WN65C-B offers a 3440x1440 resolution, while the A32Q8 is 3840x2160.
Competitive gamers may prefer the 35WN65C-B for its smoother 100Hz refresh rate.
