Compare Displays
Share Comparison
| Display |  $19799 | $18499 |
|---|---|---|
Screen Size | 31.5" | 24" |
Resolution | 2560x1440 | 1920x1080 |
Refresh Rate | 165Hz | 144Hz |
Response Time | 1ms | 1ms |
Panel Type | VA | TN |
Aspect Ratio | 16:9 | 16:9 |
Curved | No | No |
Frame Sync | FreeSync | FreeSync |
Max Brightness | 250 nits | 350 nits |
Color | Black | Black |
FreeSync | Yes | Yes |
GSYNC | No | No |
H Resolution | 2560 | 1920 |
Ports Dvi | 0 | 1 |
V Resolution | 1440 | 1080 |
Comparison Analysis
Comparing the ED270U P vs XFA240 bmjdpr reveals distinct differences in their targeted use cases.
The XFA240 bmjdpr is the more budget-friendly option, costing approximately $13 (7%) less than the ED270U P.
The ED270U P offers a 2560x1440 resolution, while the XFA240 bmjdpr is 1920x1080.
Competitive gamers may prefer the ED270U P for its smoother 165Hz refresh rate.