Compare Displays
Share Comparison
| Display | Philips $99999 | Philips $39999 |
|---|---|---|
Screen Size | 48.8" | 26.5" |
Resolution | 5120x1440 | 2560x1440 |
Refresh Rate | 70Hz | 360Hz |
Response Time | 5ms | 1ms |
Panel Type | VA | QD-OLED |
Aspect Ratio | 32:9 | 16:9 |
Curved | Yes | No |
Frame Sync | FreeSync | G-Sync |
Max Brightness | 450 nits | 1000 nits |
Total HDMI Ports | 2 | 2 |
Color | Black | White |
FreeSync | Yes | Yes |
GSYNC | No | Yes |
H Resolution | 5120 | 2560 |
HDMI 2.0 Ports | 2 | 0 |
HDMI 2.1 Ports | 0 | 2 |
V Resolution | 1440 | 1440 |
Comparison Analysis
Comparing the 498P9 vs Evnia 8000 27M2N8500 reveals distinct differences in their targeted use cases.
The Evnia 8000 27M2N8500 is the more budget-friendly option, costing approximately $600 (150%) less than the 498P9.
The 498P9 offers a 5120x1440 resolution, while the Evnia 8000 27M2N8500 is 2560x1440.
Competitive gamers may prefer the Evnia 8000 27M2N8500 for its smoother 360Hz refresh rate.