Compare Displays
Share Comparison
| Display |  $2,80084 |  $2,00048 |
|---|---|---|
Screen Size | 38" | 32" |
Resolution | 3840x1600 | 3840x2160 |
Refresh Rate | 75Hz | 150Hz |
Response Time | 1ms | 1ms |
Panel Type | IPS | IPS |
Aspect Ratio | 12:5 | 16:9 |
Curved | Yes | No |
Frame Sync | FreeSync | G-Sync |
Max Brightness | 300 nits | 600 nits |
Color | White | Black |
FreeSync | Yes | Yes |
GSYNC | No | Yes |
H Resolution | 3840 | 3840 |
V Resolution | 1600 | 2160 |
Comparison Analysis
Comparing the 38CB99-W vs XG320U reveals distinct differences in their targeted use cases.
The XG320U is the more budget-friendly option, costing approximately $800 (40%) less than the 38CB99-W.
The 38CB99-W offers a 3840x1600 resolution, while the XG320U is 3840x2160.
Competitive gamers may prefer the XG320U for its smoother 150Hz refresh rate.