Compare Displays
Share Comparison
| Display |  $20499 |  $1,11500 |
|---|---|---|
Screen Size | 31.5" | 32" |
Resolution | 2560x1440 | 3840x2160 |
Refresh Rate | 170Hz | 240Hz |
Response Time | 1ms | 1ms |
Panel Type | VA | VA |
Aspect Ratio | 16:9 | 16:9 |
Curved | No | Yes |
Frame Sync | FreeSync | G-Sync |
Max Brightness | 300 nits | 1000 nits |
Total HDMI Ports | 1 | 2 |
Total DisplayPort Ports | 1 | 0 |
Color | Black | Black |
FreeSync | Yes | Yes |
GSYNC | No | Yes |
H Resolution | 2560 | 3840 |
DisplayPort 1.2 Ports | 1 | 0 |
HDMI 2.0 Ports | 1 | 0 |
HDMI 2.1 Ports | 0 | 2 |
V Resolution | 1440 | 2160 |
Comparison Analysis
Comparing the TUF Gaming VG32AQA1A vs Odyssey Neo G8 reveals distinct differences in their targeted use cases.
The TUF Gaming VG32AQA1A is the more budget-friendly option, costing approximately $910 (444%) less than the Odyssey Neo G8.
The TUF Gaming VG32AQA1A offers a 2560x1440 resolution, while the Odyssey Neo G8 is 3840x2160.
Competitive gamers may prefer the Odyssey Neo G8 for its smoother 240Hz refresh rate.