Compare Displays
Share Comparison
| Display | ![]() $29900 | ![]() $20499 |
|---|---|---|
Screen Size | 31.5" | 31.5" |
Resolution | 2560x1440 | 2560x1440 |
Refresh Rate | 180Hz | 170Hz |
Response Time | 1ms | 1ms |
Panel Type | VA | VA |
Aspect Ratio | 16:9 | 16:9 |
Curved | Yes | No |
Frame Sync | FreeSync | FreeSync |
Max Brightness | 350 nits | 300 nits |
Total HDMI Ports | 1 | 1 |
Total DisplayPort Ports | 0 | 1 |
Color | Black | Black |
FreeSync | Yes | Yes |
GSYNC | No | No |
H Resolution | 2560 | 2560 |
DisplayPort 1.2 Ports | 0 | 1 |
HDMI 2.0 Ports | 1 | 1 |
V Resolution | 1440 | 1440 |
Comparison Analysis
Comparing the ROG Strix XG32WCS vs TUF Gaming VG32AQA1A reveals distinct differences in their targeted use cases.
The TUF Gaming VG32AQA1A is the more budget-friendly option, costing approximately $94 (46%) less than the ROG Strix XG32WCS.
Competitive gamers may prefer the ROG Strix XG32WCS for its smoother 180Hz refresh rate.
