Compare Displays
Share Comparison
| Display | KTC $27999 | ![]() $22542 |
|---|---|---|
Screen Size | 32" | 27" |
Resolution | 3840x2160 | 2560x1440 |
Refresh Rate | 60Hz | 75Hz |
Response Time | 1ms | 5ms |
Panel Type | VA | IPS |
Aspect Ratio | 16:9 | 16:9 |
Curved | No | No |
Frame Sync | - | FreeSync |
Max Brightness | 300 nits | 350 nits |
Total HDMI Ports | 1 | 0 |
Color | Grey | Black |
FreeSync | No | Yes |
GSYNC | No | No |
H Resolution | 3840 | 2560 |
Ports Dvi | 0 | 1 |
HDMI 2.1 Ports | 1 | 0 |
V Resolution | 2160 | 1440 |
Comparison Analysis
Comparing the A32Q8 vs ProArt Display PA278QV reveals distinct differences in their targeted use cases.
The ProArt Display PA278QV is the more budget-friendly option, costing approximately $55 (24%) less than the A32Q8.
The A32Q8 offers a 3840x2160 resolution, while the ProArt Display PA278QV is 2560x1440.
Competitive gamers may prefer the ProArt Display PA278QV for its smoother 75Hz refresh rate.
