Compare Displays
Share Comparison
| Display |  $62799 | INNOCN $79949 |
|---|---|---|
Screen Size | 27" | 40" |
Resolution | 2560x1440 | 5120x2160 |
Refresh Rate | 360Hz | 100Hz |
Response Time | 0.5ms | 8ms |
Panel Type | IPS | IPS |
Aspect Ratio | 16:9 | 64:27 |
Curved | No | No |
Frame Sync | G-Sync | - |
Hdr | HDR 10 | - |
Total HDMI Ports | - | 2 |
Color | Black | Black |
FreeSync | Yes | No |
GSYNC | Yes | No |
H Resolution | 2560 | 5120 |
DisplayPort 1.4a Ports | 1 | 0 |
HDMI 2.0 Ports | - | 2 |
HDMI 2.1 Ports | 2 | 0 |
Pulsar | Yes | - |
V Resolution | 1440 | 2160 |
Newegg — Check |
Comparison Analysis
Comparing the MPG 272QRF X36 vs 40C1U 5K reveals distinct differences in their targeted use cases.
The MPG 272QRF X36 is the more budget-friendly option, costing approximately $172 (27%) less than the 40C1U 5K.
The MPG 272QRF X36 offers a 2560x1440 resolution, while the 40C1U 5K is 5120x2160.
Competitive gamers may prefer the MPG 272QRF X36 for its smoother 360Hz refresh rate.