Compare Displays
Share Comparison
| Display |  $62799 | BenQ $64800 |
|---|---|---|
Screen Size | 27" | 32" |
Resolution | 2560x1440 | 3840x2160 |
Refresh Rate | 360Hz | 60Hz |
Response Time | 0.5ms | 4ms |
Panel Type | IPS | IPS |
Aspect Ratio | 16:9 | 16:9 |
Curved | No | No |
Frame Sync | G-Sync | - |
Max Brightness | - | 350 nits |
Hdr | HDR 10 | - |
Color | Black | - |
FreeSync | Yes | No |
GSYNC | Yes | No |
H Resolution | 2560 | 3840 |
DisplayPort 1.4a Ports | 1 | 0 |
HDMI 2.1 Ports | 2 | 0 |
Pulsar | Yes | - |
V Resolution | 1440 | 2160 |
Newegg — Check |
Comparison Analysis
Comparing the MPG 272QRF X36 vs PD3200U reveals distinct differences in their targeted use cases.
Both components are priced similarly, making the choice dependent on specific features rather than budget.
The MPG 272QRF X36 offers a 2560x1440 resolution, while the PD3200U is 3840x2160.
Competitive gamers may prefer the MPG 272QRF X36 for its smoother 360Hz refresh rate.