Compare Displays
Share Comparison
| Display | ![]() $1,44999 | Philips $2,23380 |
|---|---|---|
Screen Size | 57" | 48.9" |
Resolution | 7680x2160 | 5120x1440 |
Refresh Rate | 240Hz | 240Hz |
Response Time | 1ms | 0.03ms |
Panel Type | VA | QD-OLED |
Aspect Ratio | 32:9 | 32:9 |
Curved | Yes | Yes |
Frame Sync | G-Sync | G-Sync |
Max Brightness | 1000 nits | 450 nits |
Total HDMI Ports | 3 | 2 |
Total DisplayPort Ports | 3 | 0 |
Color | - | Grey |
FreeSync | Yes | Yes |
GSYNC | Yes | Yes |
H Resolution | 7680 | 5120 |
Ports Displayport21 | 3 | 0 |
HDMI 2.1 Ports | 3 | 2 |
V Resolution | 2160 | 1440 |
Comparison Analysis
Comparing the Odyssey Neo G95NC 7680 x 2160 vs Evnia 49M2C8900 reveals distinct differences in their targeted use cases.
The Odyssey Neo G95NC 7680 x 2160 is the more budget-friendly option, costing approximately $784 (54%) less than the Evnia 49M2C8900.
The Odyssey Neo G95NC 7680 x 2160 offers a 7680x2160 resolution, while the Evnia 49M2C8900 is 5120x1440.
