Compare Displays
Share Comparison
| Display |  $1,44999 |  $20499 |
|---|---|---|
Screen Size | 57" | 31.5" |
Resolution | 7680x2160 | 2560x1440 |
Refresh Rate | 240Hz | 170Hz |
Response Time | 1ms | 1ms |
Panel Type | VA | VA |
Aspect Ratio | 32:9 | 16:9 |
Curved | Yes | No |
Frame Sync | G-Sync | FreeSync |
Max Brightness | 1000 nits | 300 nits |
Total HDMI Ports | 3 | 1 |
Total DisplayPort Ports | 3 | 1 |
Color | - | Black |
FreeSync | Yes | Yes |
GSYNC | Yes | No |
H Resolution | 7680 | 2560 |
DisplayPort 1.2 Ports | 0 | 1 |
Ports Displayport21 | 3 | 0 |
HDMI 2.0 Ports | 0 | 1 |
HDMI 2.1 Ports | 3 | 0 |
V Resolution | 2160 | 1440 |
Comparison Analysis
Comparing the Odyssey Neo G95NC 7680 x 2160 vs TUF Gaming VG32AQA1A reveals distinct differences in their targeted use cases.
The TUF Gaming VG32AQA1A is the more budget-friendly option, costing approximately $1245 (607%) less than the Odyssey Neo G95NC 7680 x 2160.
The Odyssey Neo G95NC 7680 x 2160 offers a 7680x2160 resolution, while the TUF Gaming VG32AQA1A is 2560x1440.
Competitive gamers may prefer the Odyssey Neo G95NC 7680 x 2160 for its smoother 240Hz refresh rate.