Compare Displays
Share Comparison
| Display |  $1,44999 |  $1,19999 |
|---|---|---|
Screen Size | 57" | 47.53" |
Resolution | 7680x2160 | 3840x2160 |
Refresh Rate | 240Hz | 138Hz |
Response Time | 1ms | 0.1ms |
Panel Type | VA | OLED |
Aspect Ratio | 32:9 | 16:9 |
Curved | Yes | No |
Frame Sync | G-Sync | G-Sync |
Max Brightness | 1000 nits | 450 nits |
Total HDMI Ports | 3 | 2 |
Total DisplayPort Ports | 3 | 0 |
Color | - | Black |
FreeSync | Yes | No |
GSYNC | Yes | Yes |
H Resolution | 7680 | 3840 |
Ports Displayport21 | 3 | 0 |
HDMI 2.1 Ports | 3 | 2 |
V Resolution | 2160 | 2160 |
Comparison Analysis
Comparing the Odyssey Neo G95NC 7680 x 2160 vs ROG Swift OLED PG48UQ reveals distinct differences in their targeted use cases.
The ROG Swift OLED PG48UQ is the more budget-friendly option, costing approximately $250 (21%) less than the Odyssey Neo G95NC 7680 x 2160.
The Odyssey Neo G95NC 7680 x 2160 offers a 7680x2160 resolution, while the ROG Swift OLED PG48UQ is 3840x2160.
Competitive gamers may prefer the Odyssey Neo G95NC 7680 x 2160 for its smoother 240Hz refresh rate.