Compare Displays
Share Comparison
| Display |  $79999 |  $24600 |
|---|---|---|
Screen Size | 49" | 31.5" |
Resolution | 5120x1440 | 2560x1440 |
Refresh Rate | 144Hz | 100Hz |
Response Time | 0.03ms | 5ms |
Panel Type | QD-OLED | IPS |
Aspect Ratio | 32:9 | 16:9 |
Curved | Yes | No |
Frame Sync | FreeSync | - |
Max Brightness | 250 nits | 250 nits |
Total HDMI Ports | 1 | 0 |
Total DisplayPort Ports | 1 | 0 |
Color | Black | Black |
FreeSync | Yes | No |
GSYNC | No | No |
H Resolution | 5120 | 2560 |
DisplayPort 1.4a Ports | 1 | 0 |
HDMI 2.1 Ports | 1 | 0 |
V Resolution | 1440 | 1440 |
Comparison Analysis
Comparing the MPG 491CQP vs 32U631A-B reveals distinct differences in their targeted use cases.
The 32U631A-B is the more budget-friendly option, costing approximately $554 (225%) less than the MPG 491CQP.
The MPG 491CQP offers a 5120x1440 resolution, while the 32U631A-B is 2560x1440.
Competitive gamers may prefer the MPG 491CQP for its smoother 144Hz refresh rate.