Compare Displays
Share Comparison
| Display |  $80398 |  $62599 |
|---|---|---|
Screen Size | 49" | 27" |
Resolution | 5120x1440 | 2560x1440 |
Refresh Rate | 144Hz | 360Hz |
Response Time | 0.03ms | 0.5ms |
Panel Type | QD-OLED | IPS |
Aspect Ratio | 32:9 | 16:9 |
Curved | Yes | No |
Frame Sync | FreeSync | G-Sync |
Max Brightness | 250 nits | - |
Total HDMI Ports | 1 | - |
Total DisplayPort Ports | 1 | - |
Color | Black | Black |
FreeSync | Yes | Yes |
GSYNC | No | Yes |
H Resolution | 5120 | 2560 |
DisplayPort 1.4a Ports | 1 | 1 |
HDMI 2.1 Ports | 1 | 2 |
Pulsar | - | Yes |
V Resolution | 1440 | 1440 |
Newegg — Check |
Comparison Analysis
Comparing the MPG 491CQP vs Predator XB273U F5 reveals distinct differences in their targeted use cases.
The Predator XB273U F5 is the more budget-friendly option, costing approximately $178 (28%) less than the MPG 491CQP.
The MPG 491CQP offers a 5120x1440 resolution, while the Predator XB273U F5 is 2560x1440.
Competitive gamers may prefer the Predator XB273U F5 for its smoother 360Hz refresh rate.