Compare GPUs
Share Comparison
| GPU |  $59500 |  $1,09900 |
|---|---|---|
Base Clock | 1968 MHz | 2310 MHz |
Boost Clock | 2607 MHz | 2610 MHz |
Bus | PCI Express 4.0 | PCI Express 4.0 |
Chipset Manufacturer | AMD | NVIDIA |
Color | Black | Black |
Cooling | 3 Fans | 3 Fans |
CUDA Cores | - | 7680 |
DisplayPort 1.4a Outputs | 2 | 3 |
Frame Gen | - | DLSS Frame Generation |
Frame Sync | FreeSync | GSYNC |
GPU | Radeon RX 6600 XT | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
HDMI 2.0 Outputs | 2 | 0 |
HDMI 2.1a Outputs | 0 | 1 |
HDMI 2.1b Outputs | 0 | 1 |
Bus | PCIe x16 | PCIe x16 |
Length | 282 mm | 332 mm |
Memory Bandwidth | 16 Gbps | - |
Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6X |
PCIe 8-Pin | 1 | 0 |
Series | Radeon RX 6000 | GeForce RTX 40 |
Slot Size | 3 | 4 |
TDP | 160W | 285W |
Upscaling | FSR 3.1 | DLSS 4.5 |
VRAM | 8 GB | 12 GB |
Part Number | GV-R66XTGAMINGOC PRO-8GD | VCG4070T12TFXXPB1 |
Comparison Analysis
Comparing the GAMING OC PRO vs XLR8 Gaming VERTO EPIC-X reveals distinct differences in their targeted use cases.
The GAMING OC PRO is the more budget-friendly option, costing approximately $504 (85%) less than the XLR8 Gaming VERTO EPIC-X.
For high-resolution textures and creative workloads, the XLR8 Gaming VERTO EPIC-X has the advantage with 4GB more VRAM.
Builders with compact cases should consider the GAMING OC PRO, which is significantly shorter.