Compare GPUs
Share Comparison
| GPU |  $000 |  $000 |
|---|---|---|
Ai Tops | - | 1801 |
Base Clock | - | 2617 MHz |
Boost Clock | 2565 MHz | 2640 MHz |
Bus | PCI Express 5.0 | PCI Express 5.0 |
Chipset Manufacturer | NVIDIA | NVIDIA |
Color | Black | Black |
Cooling | AIO | 3 Fans |
CUDA Cores | 21760 | 10752 |
Displayport 21b Outputs | 3 | 3 |
Frame Gen | DLSS Multi Frame Generation | DLSS Multi Frame Generation |
Frame Sync | GSYNC | GSYNC |
GPU | GeForce RTX 5090 | GeForce RTX 5080 |
HDMI 2.1b Outputs | 1 | 1 |
Bus | PCIe x16 | PCIe x16 |
Length | 260 mm | 304 mm |
Memory Bandwidth | 28 Gbps | 30 Gbps |
Memory Type | GDDR7 | GDDR7 |
PCIe 12V-2x6 | 2 | - |
PCIe 12VHPWR | - | 1 |
Series | - | GeForce RTX 50 |
Slot Size | 3 | 2.5 |
TDP | 800W | - |
Upscaling | DLSS 4.5 | DLSS 4.5 |
Vendor Oc Clock | 2610 MHz | - |
VRAM | 32 GB | 16 GB |
Width | 151 mm | 126 mm |
Part Number | G5090-32LX | PRIME-RTX5080-16G-EVO |
Comparison Analysis
Comparing the LIGHTNING X vs PRIME EVO reveals distinct differences in their targeted use cases.
For high-resolution textures and creative workloads, the LIGHTNING X has the advantage with 16GB more VRAM.
Builders with compact cases should consider the LIGHTNING X, which is significantly shorter.