Compare GPUs
Share Comparison
| GPU |  $1,79500 |  $2,25999 |
|---|---|---|
Base Clock | 2210 MHz | 2375 MHz |
Boost Clock | 2565 MHz | 2525 MHz |
Bus | PCI Express 4.0 | PCI Express 4.0 |
Chipset Manufacturer | NVIDIA | AMD |
Color | Black | - |
Cooling | 3 Fans | Water Cooled |
CUDA Cores | 10240 | 5120 |
DisplayPort 1.4a Outputs | 3 | 2 |
Frame Gen | DLSS Frame Generation | - |
Frame Sync | GSYNC | FreeSync |
GPU | GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER | Radeon RX 6900 XT |
HDMI 2.1a Outputs | 1 | 2 |
HDMI 2.1b Outputs | 1 | 2 |
Bus | PCIe x16 | - |
Length | 340 mm | 282 mm |
Memory Bandwidth | - | 16 Gbps |
Memory Type | GDDR6X | GDDR6 |
PCIe 12VHPWR | 1 | 0 |
PCIe 8-Pin | 0 | 3 |
Series | GeForce RTX 40 | AORUS |
Slot Size | 3 | 0 |
TDP | 320W | 0W |
Upscaling | DLSS 4.5 | - |
VRAM | 16 GB | 16 GB |
Part Number | VCG4080S16TFXPB1-O | - |
Comparison Analysis
Comparing the VERTO OC vs AORUS XTREME WATERFORCE reveals distinct differences in their targeted use cases.
The VERTO OC is the more budget-friendly option, costing approximately $465 (26%) less than the AORUS XTREME WATERFORCE.
Builders with compact cases should consider the AORUS XTREME WATERFORCE, which is significantly shorter.