Compare GPUs
Share Comparison
| GPU |  $47500 |  $49900 |
|---|---|---|
Base Clock | 1923 MHz | 1968 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1923 MHz | 2607 MHz |
Bus | PCI Express 4.0 | PCI Express 4.0 |
Chipset Manufacturer | AMD | AMD |
Color | - | Black |
Cooling | 1 Fan | 3 Fans |
CUDA Cores | 768 | - |
DisplayPort 1.4a Outputs | 1 | 2 |
Frame Sync | FreeSync | FreeSync |
GPU | Radeon RX 6400 | Radeon RX 6600 XT |
HDMI 2.0 Outputs | 0 | 2 |
HDMI 2.1a Outputs | 1 | 0 |
HDMI 2.1b Outputs | 1 | 0 |
Bus | PCIe x16 | PCIe x16 |
Length | 162 mm | 282 mm |
Memory Bandwidth | - | 16 Gbps |
Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
PCIe 8-Pin | 0 | 1 |
Series | Radeon RX 6000 | Radeon RX 6000 |
Slot Size | 2 | 3 |
TDP | 53W | 160W |
Upscaling | FSR 3.1 | FSR 3.1 |
VRAM | 4 GB | 8 GB |
Part Number | RX6400 CLI 4G 90-GA3CZZ-00UANF | GV-R66XTGAMINGOC PRO-8GD |
Comparison Analysis
Comparing the Challenger ITX vs GAMING OC PRO reveals distinct differences in their targeted use cases.
The Challenger ITX is the more budget-friendly option, costing approximately $24 (5%) less than the GAMING OC PRO.
For high-resolution textures and creative workloads, the GAMING OC PRO has the advantage with 4GB more VRAM.
Builders with compact cases should consider the Challenger ITX, which is significantly shorter.