Compare GPUs
Share Comparison
| GPU |  $14498 |  $19900 |
|---|---|---|
Base Clock | 1750 MHz | 1235 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1000 MHz | 1620 MHz |
Bus | PCI Express 4.0 | PCI Express 4.0 |
Chipset Manufacturer | Intel | AMD |
Color | Blue | - |
Cooling | 1 Fan | 2 Fans |
DisplayPort 1.4a Outputs | 0 | 3 |
Frame Sync | GSYNC | FreeSync |
GPU | Arc A310 | Radeon RX 5600 XT |
HDMI 2.0 Outputs | 1 | 1 |
Bus | PCIe x16 | - |
Length | 156 mm | 231 mm |
Memory Bandwidth | - | 14 Gbps |
Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
PCIe 8-Pin | 0 | 1 |
Series | Arc A310 | Radeon RX 5000 |
Slot Size | 1 | 2.5 |
TDP | 50W | 150W |
Upscaling | - | FSR 3.1 |
VRAM | 4 GB | 6 GB |
Part Number | SA310C-4G 1A1-S00401900G | - |
Comparison Analysis
Comparing the ECO vs MECH OC reveals distinct differences in their targeted use cases.
The ECO is the more budget-friendly option, costing approximately $54 (37%) less than the MECH OC.
For high-resolution textures and creative workloads, the MECH OC has the advantage with 2GB more VRAM.
Builders with compact cases should consider the ECO, which is significantly shorter.