Compare GPUs
Share Comparison
| GPU | ![]() $2,89500 | ![]() $2,25999 |
|---|---|---|
Base Clock | 1395 MHz | 2375 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1770 MHz | 2525 MHz |
Bus | PCI Express 4.0 | PCI Express 4.0 |
Chipset Manufacturer | NVIDIA | AMD |
Color | Black | - |
Cooling | 1 Fan | Water Cooled |
CUDA Cores | 0 | 5120 |
DisplayPort 1.4a Outputs | 4 | 2 |
Frame Sync | GSYNC | FreeSync |
GPU | Quadro RTX 8000 | Radeon RX 6900 XT |
HDMI 2.1a Outputs | 0 | 2 |
HDMI 2.1b Outputs | 0 | 2 |
Bus | PCIe x16 | - |
Length | 267 mm | 282 mm |
Memory Bandwidth | 14 Gbps | 16 Gbps |
Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
PCIe 8-Pin | 0 | 3 |
Series | Quadro RTX 8000 | AORUS |
Slot Size | 2 | 0 |
TDP | 295W | 0W |
Upscaling | DLSS 4.5 | - |
VRAM | 48 GB | 16 GB |
Part Number | VCQRTX8000-PB VCQRTX8000-SB | - |
Comparison Analysis
Comparing the Quadro RTX 8000 vs AORUS XTREME WATERFORCE reveals distinct differences in their targeted use cases.
The AORUS XTREME WATERFORCE is the more budget-friendly option, costing approximately $635 (28%) less than the Quadro RTX 8000.
For high-resolution textures and creative workloads, the Quadro RTX 8000 has the advantage with 32GB more VRAM.

