Compare GPUs
Share Comparison
| GPU |  $2,51298 |  $1,79500 |
|---|---|---|
Base Clock | 2010 MHz | 2210 MHz |
Boost Clock | 2422 MHz | 2565 MHz |
Bus | PCI Express 4.0 | PCI Express 4.0 |
Chipset Manufacturer | NVIDIA | NVIDIA |
Color | White | Black |
Cooling | 3 Fans | 3 Fans |
CUDA Cores | 21760 | 10240 |
DisplayPort 1.4a Outputs | 0 | 3 |
DisplayPort 2.1 Outputs | 3 | 0 |
Frame Gen | DLSS Multi Frame Generation | DLSS Frame Generation |
Frame Sync | GSYNC | GSYNC |
GPU | GeForce RTX 5090 | GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER |
HDMI 2.1a Outputs | 1 | 1 |
HDMI 2.1b Outputs | 1 | 1 |
Bus | PCIe x16 | PCIe x16 |
Length | 330 mm | 340 mm |
Memory Type | GDDR7 | GDDR6X |
PCIe 12VHPWR | 0 | 1 |
Series | GeForce RTX 50 | GeForce RTX 40 |
Slot Size | 4 | 3 |
TDP | 575W | 320W |
Upscaling | DLSS 4.5 | DLSS 4.5 |
VRAM | 32 GB | 16 GB |
Part Number | ZT-B50900Q-10P | VCG4080S16TFXPB1-O |
Comparison Analysis
Comparing the GAMING SOLID OC vs VERTO OC reveals distinct differences in their targeted use cases.
The VERTO OC is the more budget-friendly option, costing approximately $718 (40%) less than the GAMING SOLID OC.
For high-resolution textures and creative workloads, the GAMING SOLID OC has the advantage with 16GB more VRAM.