Compare GPUs
Share Comparison
| GPU |  $2,51298 |  $2,89500 |
|---|---|---|
Base Clock | 2010 MHz | 1395 MHz |
Boost Clock | 2422 MHz | 1770 MHz |
Bus | PCI Express 4.0 | PCI Express 4.0 |
Chipset Manufacturer | NVIDIA | NVIDIA |
Color | White | Black |
Cooling | 3 Fans | 1 Fan |
CUDA Cores | 21760 | 0 |
DisplayPort 1.4a Outputs | 0 | 4 |
DisplayPort 2.1 Outputs | 3 | 0 |
Frame Gen | DLSS Multi Frame Generation | - |
Frame Sync | GSYNC | GSYNC |
GPU | GeForce RTX 5090 | Quadro RTX 8000 |
HDMI 2.1a Outputs | 1 | 0 |
HDMI 2.1b Outputs | 1 | 0 |
Bus | PCIe x16 | PCIe x16 |
Length | 330 mm | 267 mm |
Memory Bandwidth | - | 14 Gbps |
Memory Type | GDDR7 | GDDR6 |
Series | GeForce RTX 50 | Quadro RTX 8000 |
Slot Size | 4 | 2 |
TDP | 575W | 295W |
Upscaling | DLSS 4.5 | DLSS 4.5 |
VRAM | 32 GB | 48 GB |
Part Number | ZT-B50900Q-10P | VCQRTX8000-PB VCQRTX8000-SB |
Comparison Analysis
Comparing the GAMING SOLID OC vs Quadro RTX 8000 reveals distinct differences in their targeted use cases.
The GAMING SOLID OC is the more budget-friendly option, costing approximately $382 (15%) less than the Quadro RTX 8000.
For high-resolution textures and creative workloads, the Quadro RTX 8000 has the advantage with 16GB more VRAM.
Builders with compact cases should consider the Quadro RTX 8000, which is significantly shorter.