Compare GPUs
Share Comparison
| GPU |  $1,83200 |  $1,41638 |
|---|---|---|
Base Clock | 2321 MHz | 2685 MHz |
Boost Clock | 2321 MHz | 2670 MHz |
Bus | PCI Express 4.0 | PCI Express 4.0 |
Chipset Manufacturer | AMD | NVIDIA |
Cooling | 3 Fans | 3 Fans |
CUDA Cores | 2560 | 4352 |
DisplayPort 1.4a Outputs | 3 | 3 |
Frame Gen | - | DLSS Frame Generation |
Frame Sync | FreeSync | GSYNC |
GPU | Radeon RX 6700 XT | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti |
HDMI 2.0 Outputs | 1 | 0 |
HDMI 2.1a Outputs | 0 | 1 |
HDMI 2.1b Outputs | 0 | 1 |
Bus | PCIe x16 | - |
Length | 322 mm | 338 mm |
Memory Bandwidth | 16 Gbps | - |
Memory Clock | 0 | 18 |
Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
PCIe 8-Pin | 0 | 1 |
Series | Radeon RX 6000 | GeForce RTX 40 |
Slot Size | 3 | 2 |
TDP | 230W | 160W |
Upscaling | FSR 3.1 | DLSS 4.5 |
VRAM | 12 GB | 8 GB |
Part Number | TUF-RX6700XT-O12G-GAMING 90YV0G80-M0NA00 | - |
Comparison Analysis
Comparing the TUF GAMING OC vs GAMING X TRIO reveals distinct differences in their targeted use cases.
The GAMING X TRIO is the more budget-friendly option, costing approximately $416 (29%) less than the TUF GAMING OC.
For high-resolution textures and creative workloads, the TUF GAMING OC has the advantage with 4GB more VRAM.