Compare GPUs
Share Comparison
| GPU |  $41690 | XFX $50999 |
|---|---|---|
Base Clock | 1320 MHz | 1900 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1807 MHz | 3320 MHz |
Bus | PCI Express 4.0 | PCI Express 5.0 |
Chipset Manufacturer | NVIDIA | AMD |
Color | Black | Black |
Cooling | 2 Fans | 3 Fans |
CUDA Cores | 3584 | 2048 |
DisplayPort 1.4a Outputs | 2 | 0 |
DisplayPort 2.1a Outputs | 0 | 2 |
Frame Sync | GSYNC | FreeSync |
GPU | GeForce RTX 3060 8 GB | Radeon RX 9060 XT 16 GB |
HDMI 2.1a Outputs | 2 | 1 |
HDMI 2.1b Outputs | 2 | 1 |
Bus | PCIe x16 | - |
Length | 198 mm | 290 mm |
Memory Bandwidth | - | 20 Gbps |
Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
PCIe 8-Pin | 0 | 1 |
Series | GeForce RTX 30 | Radeon RX 9000 |
Slot Size | 2 | 3 |
TDP | 170W | 160W |
Upscaling | DLSS 4.5 | FSR 4 |
VRAM | 8 GB | 16 GB |
Part Number | GV-N3060GAMING OC-8GD | RX-96TS316B7 |
Comparison Analysis
Comparing the GAMING OC vs Swift OC reveals distinct differences in their targeted use cases.
The GAMING OC is the more budget-friendly option, costing approximately $93 (22%) less than the Swift OC.
For high-resolution textures and creative workloads, the Swift OC has the advantage with 8GB more VRAM.
Builders with compact cases should consider the GAMING OC, which is significantly shorter.