Compare GPUs
Share Comparison
| GPU |  $45999 |  $41999 |
|---|---|---|
Base Clock | 2220 MHz | 2317 MHz |
Boost Clock | 2220 MHz | 2617 MHz |
Bus | PCI Express 4.0 | PCI Express 4.0 |
Chipset Manufacturer | AMD | NVIDIA |
Color | Black | Black |
Cooling | 3 Fans | 2 Fans |
CUDA Cores | 2048 | 2560 |
DisplayPort 2.1a Outputs | 2 | 0 |
Displayport 21b Outputs | - | 3 |
Frame Gen | - | DLSS Multi Frame Generation |
Frame Sync | FreeSync | GSYNC |
GPU | Radeon RX 9060 XT 16 GB | GeForce RTX 5050 |
HDMI 2.1a Outputs | 1 | 1 |
HDMI 2.1b Outputs | 1 | 1 |
Bus | PCIe x16 | PCIe x16 |
Length | 281 mm | 197 mm |
Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
PCIe 8-Pin | 0 | 1 |
Series | Radeon RX 9000 | GeForce RTX 50 |
Slot Size | 2 | 2 |
TDP | 160W | 130W |
Upscaling | FSR 4 | DLSS 4.5 |
VRAM | 16 GB | 8 GB |
Part Number | GV-R9060XTGAMING OC-16GD | RTX 5050 8G SHADOW 2X OC |
Comparison Analysis
Comparing the GAMING OC vs SHADOW 2X OC reveals distinct differences in their targeted use cases.
The SHADOW 2X OC is the more budget-friendly option, costing approximately $40 (10%) less than the GAMING OC.
For high-resolution textures and creative workloads, the GAMING OC has the advantage with 8GB more VRAM.
Builders with compact cases should consider the SHADOW 2X OC, which is significantly shorter.