Compare GPUs
Share Comparison
| GPU | XFX $35999 |  $33200 |
|---|---|---|
Base Clock | 2150 MHz | 1530 MHz |
Boost Clock | 2600 MHz | 1755 MHz |
Bus | PCI Express 4.0 | PCI Express 4.0 |
Chipset Manufacturer | AMD | NVIDIA |
Color | Black | Black |
Cooling | 3 Fans | 2 Fans |
CUDA Cores | 2560 | - |
DisplayPort 1.4a Outputs | 3 | 1 |
Frame Sync | FreeSync | GSYNC |
GPU | Radeon RX 6750 XT | GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER |
HDMI 2.0 Outputs | 0 | 1 |
HDMI 2.1a Outputs | 1 | 0 |
HDMI 2.1b Outputs | 1 | 0 |
Bus | PCIe x16 | PCIe x16 |
Length | 323 mm | 202 mm |
Memory Bandwidth | 18 Gbps | 12 Gbps |
Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
Series | Radeon RX 6000 | GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER |
Slot Size | 3 | 2 |
TDP | 250W | 100W |
Upscaling | FSR 3.1 | DLSS 4.5 |
VRAM | 12 GB | 4 GB |
Part Number | RX-675XYJFDP | 04G-P4-1357-KR |
Comparison Analysis
Comparing the Speedster QICK 319 Core vs SC ULTRA GAMING reveals distinct differences in their targeted use cases.
The SC ULTRA GAMING is the more budget-friendly option, costing approximately $28 (8%) less than the Speedster QICK 319 Core.
For high-resolution textures and creative workloads, the Speedster QICK 319 Core has the advantage with 8GB more VRAM.
Builders with compact cases should consider the SC ULTRA GAMING, which is significantly shorter.