Compare GPUs
Share Comparison
| GPU | XFX $35999 |  $39900 |
|---|---|---|
Base Clock | 2150 MHz | 2317 MHz |
Boost Clock | 2600 MHz | 2572 MHz |
Bus | PCI Express 4.0 | PCI Express 4.0 |
Chipset Manufacturer | AMD | NVIDIA |
Color | Black | Black |
Cooling | 3 Fans | 1 Fan |
CUDA Cores | 2560 | 2560 |
DisplayPort 1.4a Outputs | 3 | 0 |
Displayport 21b Outputs | - | 3 |
Frame Gen | - | DLSS Multi Frame Generation |
Frame Sync | FreeSync | GSYNC |
GPU | Radeon RX 6750 XT | GeForce RTX 5050 |
HDMI 2.1a Outputs | 1 | 1 |
HDMI 2.1b Outputs | 1 | 1 |
Bus | PCIe x16 | PCIe x16 |
Length | 323 mm | 164 mm |
Memory Bandwidth | 18 Gbps | - |
Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
Series | Radeon RX 6000 | GeForce RTX 50 |
Slot Size | 3 | 2 |
TDP | 250W | 130W |
Upscaling | FSR 3.1 | DLSS 4.5 |
VRAM | 12 GB | 8 GB |
Part Number | RX-675XYJFDP | ZT-B50500G-10L |
Comparison Analysis
Comparing the Speedster QICK 319 Core vs GAMING SOLO reveals distinct differences in their targeted use cases.
The Speedster QICK 319 Core is the more budget-friendly option, costing approximately $39 (11%) less than the GAMING SOLO.
For high-resolution textures and creative workloads, the Speedster QICK 319 Core has the advantage with 4GB more VRAM.
Builders with compact cases should consider the GAMING SOLO, which is significantly shorter.