Compare GPUs
Share Comparison
| GPU | XFX $35999 |  $41999 |
|---|---|---|
Base Clock | 2150 MHz | 2317 MHz |
Boost Clock | 2600 MHz | 2617 MHz |
Bus | PCI Express 4.0 | PCI Express 4.0 |
Chipset Manufacturer | AMD | NVIDIA |
Color | Black | Black |
Cooling | 3 Fans | 2 Fans |
CUDA Cores | 2560 | 2560 |
DisplayPort 1.4a Outputs | 3 | 0 |
Displayport 21b Outputs | - | 3 |
Frame Gen | - | DLSS Multi Frame Generation |
Frame Sync | FreeSync | GSYNC |
GPU | Radeon RX 6750 XT | GeForce RTX 5050 |
HDMI 2.1a Outputs | 1 | 1 |
HDMI 2.1b Outputs | 1 | 1 |
Bus | PCIe x16 | PCIe x16 |
Length | 323 mm | 197 mm |
Memory Bandwidth | 18 Gbps | - |
Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
PCIe 8-Pin | 0 | 1 |
Series | Radeon RX 6000 | GeForce RTX 50 |
Slot Size | 3 | 2 |
TDP | 250W | 130W |
Upscaling | FSR 3.1 | DLSS 4.5 |
VRAM | 12 GB | 8 GB |
Part Number | RX-675XYJFDP | RTX 5050 8G SHADOW 2X OC |
Comparison Analysis
Comparing the Speedster QICK 319 Core vs SHADOW 2X OC reveals distinct differences in their targeted use cases.
The Speedster QICK 319 Core is the more budget-friendly option, costing approximately $60 (17%) less than the SHADOW 2X OC.
For high-resolution textures and creative workloads, the Speedster QICK 319 Core has the advantage with 4GB more VRAM.
Builders with compact cases should consider the SHADOW 2X OC, which is significantly shorter.