Compare GPUs
Share Comparison
| GPU | XFX $35999 |  $29400 |
|---|---|---|
Base Clock | 2150 MHz | 1005 MHz |
Boost Clock | 2600 MHz | 1545 MHz |
Bus | PCI Express 4.0 | PCI Express 4.0 |
Chipset Manufacturer | AMD | NVIDIA |
Color | Black | Grey |
Cooling | 3 Fans | 1 Fan |
CUDA Cores | 2560 | 0 |
DisplayPort 1.4a Outputs | 3 | 3 |
Frame Sync | FreeSync | GSYNC |
GPU | Radeon RX 6750 XT | Quadro RTX 4000 |
HDMI 2.1a Outputs | 1 | 0 |
HDMI 2.1b Outputs | 1 | 0 |
Bus | PCIe x16 | PCIe x16 |
Length | 323 mm | 267 mm |
Memory Bandwidth | 18 Gbps | 13 Gbps |
Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
Series | Radeon RX 6000 | Quadro RTX 4000 |
Slot Size | 3 | 1 |
TDP | 250W | 160W |
Upscaling | FSR 3.1 | DLSS 4.5 |
VRAM | 12 GB | 8 GB |
Part Number | RX-675XYJFDP | VCQRTX4000-PB VCQRTX4000-SB |
Comparison Analysis
Comparing the Speedster QICK 319 Core vs VCQRTX4000-PB reveals distinct differences in their targeted use cases.
The VCQRTX4000-PB is the more budget-friendly option, costing approximately $66 (22%) less than the Speedster QICK 319 Core.
For high-resolution textures and creative workloads, the Speedster QICK 319 Core has the advantage with 4GB more VRAM.
Builders with compact cases should consider the VCQRTX4000-PB, which is significantly shorter.