Compare GPUs
Share Comparison
| GPU | XFX $35999 |  $47500 |
|---|---|---|
Base Clock | 2150 MHz | 1923 MHz |
Boost Clock | 2600 MHz | 1923 MHz |
Bus | PCI Express 4.0 | PCI Express 4.0 |
Chipset Manufacturer | AMD | AMD |
Color | Black | - |
Cooling | 3 Fans | 1 Fan |
CUDA Cores | 2560 | 768 |
DisplayPort 1.4a Outputs | 3 | 1 |
Frame Sync | FreeSync | FreeSync |
GPU | Radeon RX 6750 XT | Radeon RX 6400 |
HDMI 2.1a Outputs | 1 | 1 |
HDMI 2.1b Outputs | 1 | 1 |
Bus | PCIe x16 | PCIe x16 |
Length | 323 mm | 162 mm |
Memory Bandwidth | 18 Gbps | - |
Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
Series | Radeon RX 6000 | Radeon RX 6000 |
Slot Size | 3 | 2 |
TDP | 250W | 53W |
Upscaling | FSR 3.1 | FSR 3.1 |
VRAM | 12 GB | 4 GB |
Part Number | RX-675XYJFDP | RX6400 CLI 4G 90-GA3CZZ-00UANF |
Comparison Analysis
Comparing the Speedster QICK 319 Core vs Challenger ITX reveals distinct differences in their targeted use cases.
The Speedster QICK 319 Core is the more budget-friendly option, costing approximately $115 (32%) less than the Challenger ITX.
For high-resolution textures and creative workloads, the Speedster QICK 319 Core has the advantage with 8GB more VRAM.
Builders with compact cases should consider the Challenger ITX, which is significantly shorter.