Compare GPUs
Share Comparison
| GPU | XFX $35999 | XFX $50999 |
|---|---|---|
Base Clock | 2150 MHz | 1900 MHz |
Boost Clock | 2600 MHz | 3320 MHz |
Bus | PCI Express 4.0 | PCI Express 5.0 |
Chipset Manufacturer | AMD | AMD |
Color | Black | Black |
Cooling | 3 Fans | 3 Fans |
CUDA Cores | 2560 | 2048 |
DisplayPort 1.4a Outputs | 3 | 0 |
DisplayPort 2.1a Outputs | 0 | 2 |
Frame Sync | FreeSync | FreeSync |
GPU | Radeon RX 6750 XT | Radeon RX 9060 XT 16 GB |
HDMI 2.1a Outputs | 1 | 1 |
HDMI 2.1b Outputs | 1 | 1 |
Bus | PCIe x16 | - |
Length | 323 mm | 290 mm |
Memory Bandwidth | 18 Gbps | 20 Gbps |
Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
PCIe 8-Pin | 0 | 1 |
Series | Radeon RX 6000 | Radeon RX 9000 |
Slot Size | 3 | 3 |
TDP | 250W | 160W |
Upscaling | FSR 3.1 | FSR 4 |
VRAM | 12 GB | 16 GB |
Part Number | RX-675XYJFDP | RX-96TS316B7 |
Comparison Analysis
Comparing the Speedster QICK 319 Core vs Swift OC reveals distinct differences in their targeted use cases.
The Speedster QICK 319 Core is the more budget-friendly option, costing approximately $150 (42%) less than the Swift OC.
For high-resolution textures and creative workloads, the Swift OC has the advantage with 4GB more VRAM.
Builders with compact cases should consider the Swift OC, which is significantly shorter.