Compare GPUs
Share Comparison
| GPU | XFX $35999 |  $41500 |
|---|---|---|
Base Clock | 2150 MHz | 1515 MHz |
Boost Clock | 2600 MHz | 1860 MHz |
Bus | PCI Express 4.0 | PCI Express 3.0 |
Chipset Manufacturer | AMD | NVIDIA |
Color | Black | - |
Cooling | 3 Fans | 3 Fans |
CUDA Cores | 2560 | - |
DisplayPort 1.4a Outputs | 3 | 3 |
Frame Sync | FreeSync | GSYNC |
GPU | Radeon RX 6750 XT | GeForce RTX 2080 |
HDMI 2.0 Outputs | 0 | 1 |
HDMI 2.1a Outputs | 1 | 0 |
HDMI 2.1b Outputs | 1 | 0 |
Bus | PCIe x16 | - |
Length | 323 mm | 301.925 mm |
Memory Bandwidth | 18 Gbps | 14 Gbps |
Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
PCIe 6-Pin | 0 | 1 |
PCIe 8-Pin | 0 | 1 |
Series | Radeon RX 6000 | GeForce RTX 20 |
Slot Size | 3 | 3 |
TDP | 250W | 215W |
Upscaling | FSR 3.1 | DLSS 4.5 |
VRAM | 12 GB | 8 GB |
Part Number | RX-675XYJFDP | - |
Comparison Analysis
Comparing the Speedster QICK 319 Core vs FTW3 Ultra reveals distinct differences in their targeted use cases.
The Speedster QICK 319 Core is the more budget-friendly option, costing approximately $55 (15%) less than the FTW3 Ultra.
For high-resolution textures and creative workloads, the Speedster QICK 319 Core has the advantage with 4GB more VRAM.