Compare GPUs
Share Comparison
| GPU | XFX $52999 | ![]() $62900 |
|---|---|---|
Base Clock | 1900 MHz | 2557 MHz |
Boost Clock | 3320 MHz | 2557 MHz |
Bus | PCI Express 5.0 | PCI Express 4.0 |
Chipset Manufacturer | AMD | NVIDIA |
Color | White | - |
Cooling | 3 Fans | 2 Fans |
CUDA Cores | 2048 | 6144 |
DisplayPort 2.1 Outputs | 0 | 3 |
DisplayPort 2.1a Outputs | 2 | 0 |
Frame Gen | - | DLSS Multi Frame Generation |
Frame Sync | FreeSync | GSYNC |
GPU | Radeon RX 9060 XT 16 GB | GeForce RTX 5070 |
HDMI 2.1a Outputs | 1 | 1 |
HDMI 2.1b Outputs | 1 | 1 |
Bus | - | PCIe x16 |
Length | 290 mm | 231 mm |
Memory Bandwidth | 20 Gbps | 28 Gbps |
Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR7 |
PCIe 8-Pin | 1 | 0 |
Series | Radeon RX 9000 | GeForce RTX 50 |
Slot Size | 3 | 3 |
TDP | 160W | 250W |
Upscaling | FSR 4 | DLSS 4.5 |
VRAM | 16 GB | 12 GB |
Part Number | RX-96TS316W7 | RTX 5070 12G SHADOW 2X OC GEFORCE RTX 5070 12G SHADOW 2X OC |
Comparison Analysis
Comparing the Swift OC vs SHADOW 2X OC reveals distinct differences in their targeted use cases.
The Swift OC is the more budget-friendly option, costing approximately $99 (19%) less than the SHADOW 2X OC.
For high-resolution textures and creative workloads, the Swift OC has the advantage with 4GB more VRAM.
Builders with compact cases should consider the SHADOW 2X OC, which is significantly shorter.
