Compare GPUs
Share Comparison
| GPU |  $92165 |  $7,33999 |
|---|---|---|
Base Clock | 2310 MHz | 915 MHz |
Boost Clock | 2655 MHz | 2505 MHz |
Bus | PCI Express 4.0 | PCI Express 4.0 |
Chipset Manufacturer | NVIDIA | NVIDIA |
Color | Grey | Black |
Cooling | 3 Fans | 1 Fan |
CUDA Cores | 7680 | 18176 |
DisplayPort 1.4a Outputs | 3 | 4 |
Frame Gen | DLSS Frame Generation | - |
Frame Sync | GSYNC | GSYNC |
GPU | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | RTX 6000 Ada |
HDMI 2.1a Outputs | 1 | 0 |
HDMI 2.1b Outputs | 1 | 0 |
Bus | PCIe x16 | - |
Length | 308 mm | 267 mm |
Memory Clock | 0 | 2500 |
Memory Type | GDDR6X | GDDR6 |
PCIe 12VHPWR | 1 | 0 |
PCIe 8-Pin | 0 | 2 |
Series | GeForce RTX 40 | RTX 6000 Ada Generation |
Slot Size | 3 | 2 |
TDP | 285W | 300W |
Upscaling | DLSS 4.5 | DLSS 4.5 |
VRAM | 12 GB | 48 GB |
Part Number | RTX 4070 Ti VENTUS 3X E 12G OCGeForce RTX 4070 Ti VENTUS 3X E 12G OCV513-249R912-V513-249 | VCNRTX6000ADA-PB |
Comparison Analysis
Comparing the VENTUS 3X E OC vs NVIDIA RTX 6000 ADA reveals distinct differences in their targeted use cases.
The VENTUS 3X E OC is the more budget-friendly option, costing approximately $6418 (696%) less than the NVIDIA RTX 6000 ADA.
For high-resolution textures and creative workloads, the NVIDIA RTX 6000 ADA has the advantage with 36GB more VRAM.
Builders with compact cases should consider the NVIDIA RTX 6000 ADA, which is significantly shorter.