Compare GPUs
Share Comparison
| GPU |  $38028 |  $1,18999 |
|---|---|---|
Base Clock | 1410 MHz | 2541 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1710 MHz | 2541 MHz |
Bus | PCI Express 4.0 | PCI Express 4.0 |
Chipset Manufacturer | NVIDIA | NVIDIA |
Color | Black | - |
Cooling | 2 Fans | 3 Fans |
CUDA Cores | 0 | 8960 |
DisplayPort 1.4a Outputs | 3 | 0 |
DisplayPort 2.1a Outputs | 0 | 3 |
Frame Gen | - | DLSS Multi Frame Generation |
Frame Sync | GSYNC | GSYNC |
GPU | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | GeForce RTX 5070 Ti |
HDMI 2.0 Outputs | 1 | 0 |
HDMI 2.1a Outputs | 0 | 1 |
HDMI 2.1b Outputs | 0 | 1 |
Bus | PCIe x16 | PCIe x16 |
Length | 202 mm | 304 mm |
Memory Bandwidth | 14 Gbps | 28 Gbps |
Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR7 |
Series | GeForce RTX 30 | GeForce RTX 50 |
Slot Size | 2 | 3 |
TDP | 200W | 300W |
Upscaling | DLSS 4.5 | DLSS 4.5 |
VRAM | 8 GB | 16 GB |
Part Number | 08G-P5-3663-KL | GV-N507TEAGLEOC ICE-16GD |
Comparison Analysis
Comparing the XC GAMING vs EAGLE OC ICE SFF reveals distinct differences in their targeted use cases.
The XC GAMING is the more budget-friendly option, costing approximately $810 (213%) less than the EAGLE OC ICE SFF.
For high-resolution textures and creative workloads, the EAGLE OC ICE SFF has the advantage with 8GB more VRAM.
Builders with compact cases should consider the XC GAMING, which is significantly shorter.