Compare GPUs
Share Comparison
| GPU |  $46999 | XFX $35999 |
|---|---|---|
Base Clock | 2280 MHz | 2150 MHz |
Boost Clock | 2280 MHz | 2600 MHz |
Bus | PCI Express 4.0 | PCI Express 4.0 |
Chipset Manufacturer | NVIDIA | AMD |
Color | White | Black |
Cooling | 2 Fans | 3 Fans |
CUDA Cores | 3840 | 2560 |
DisplayPort 1.4a Outputs | 0 | 3 |
DisplayPort 2.1 Outputs | 3 | 0 |
Frame Gen | DLSS Multi Frame Generation | - |
Frame Sync | GSYNC | FreeSync |
GPU | GeForce RTX 5060 | Radeon RX 6750 XT |
HDMI 2.1a Outputs | 1 | 1 |
HDMI 2.1b Outputs | 1 | 1 |
Bus | PCIe x16 | PCIe x16 |
Length | 208 mm | 323 mm |
Memory Bandwidth | 28 Gbps | 18 Gbps |
Memory Type | GDDR7 | GDDR6 |
Series | GeForce RTX 50 | Radeon RX 6000 |
Slot Size | 2 | 3 |
TDP | 145W | 250W |
Upscaling | DLSS 4.5 | FSR 3.1 |
VRAM | 8 GB | 12 GB |
Part Number | GV-N5060EAGLEOC ICE-8GD | RX-675XYJFDP |
Comparison Analysis
Comparing the EAGLE OC ICE vs Speedster QICK 319 Core reveals distinct differences in their targeted use cases.
The Speedster QICK 319 Core is the more budget-friendly option, costing approximately $110 (31%) less than the EAGLE OC ICE.
For high-resolution textures and creative workloads, the Speedster QICK 319 Core has the advantage with 4GB more VRAM.
Builders with compact cases should consider the EAGLE OC ICE, which is significantly shorter.