Compare GPUs
Share Comparison
| GPU |  $1,24900 |  $49900 |
|---|---|---|
Base Clock | 2310 MHz | 1968 MHz |
Boost Clock | 2610 MHz | 2607 MHz |
Bus | PCI Express 4.0 | PCI Express 4.0 |
Chipset Manufacturer | NVIDIA | AMD |
Color | Black | Black |
Cooling | 3 Fans | 3 Fans |
CUDA Cores | 7680 | - |
DisplayPort 1.4a Outputs | 3 | 2 |
Frame Gen | DLSS Frame Generation | - |
Frame Sync | GSYNC | FreeSync |
GPU | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | Radeon RX 6600 XT |
HDMI 2.0 Outputs | 0 | 2 |
HDMI 2.1a Outputs | 1 | 0 |
HDMI 2.1b Outputs | 1 | 0 |
Bus | PCIe x16 | PCIe x16 |
Length | 332 mm | 282 mm |
Memory Bandwidth | - | 16 Gbps |
Memory Type | GDDR6X | GDDR6 |
PCIe 8-Pin | 0 | 1 |
Series | GeForce RTX 40 | Radeon RX 6000 |
Slot Size | 4 | 3 |
TDP | 285W | 160W |
Upscaling | DLSS 4.5 | FSR 3.1 |
VRAM | 12 GB | 8 GB |
Part Number | VCG4070T12TFXXPB1 | GV-R66XTGAMINGOC PRO-8GD |
Comparison Analysis
Comparing the XLR8 Gaming VERTO EPIC-X vs GAMING OC PRO reveals distinct differences in their targeted use cases.
The GAMING OC PRO is the more budget-friendly option, costing approximately $750 (150%) less than the XLR8 Gaming VERTO EPIC-X.
For high-resolution textures and creative workloads, the XLR8 Gaming VERTO EPIC-X has the advantage with 4GB more VRAM.
Builders with compact cases should consider the GAMING OC PRO, which is significantly shorter.