Compare GPUs
Share Comparison
| GPU |  $1,24900 |  $1,14400 |
|---|---|---|
Base Clock | 2310 MHz | 1515 MHz |
Boost Clock | 2610 MHz | 1890 MHz |
Bus | PCI Express 4.0 | PCI Express 3.0 |
Chipset Manufacturer | NVIDIA | NVIDIA |
Color | Black | - |
Cooling | 3 Fans | WATERFORCE |
CUDA Cores | 7680 | - |
DisplayPort 1.4a Outputs | 3 | 3 |
Frame Gen | DLSS Frame Generation | - |
Frame Sync | GSYNC | GSYNC |
GPU | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | GeForce RTX 2080 |
HDMI 2.1a Outputs | 1 | 3 |
HDMI 2.1b Outputs | 1 | 3 |
Bus | PCIe x16 | - |
Length | 332 mm | 291 mm |
Memory Bandwidth | - | 14 Gbps |
Memory Type | GDDR6X | GDDR6 |
PCIe 8-Pin | 0 | 2 |
Series | GeForce RTX 40 | GeForce RTX 20 |
Slot Size | 4 | 0 |
TDP | 285W | 215W |
Upscaling | DLSS 4.5 | - |
VRAM | 12 GB | 8 GB |
Part Number | VCG4070T12TFXXPB1 | - |
Comparison Analysis
Comparing the XLR8 Gaming VERTO EPIC-X vs XTREME WATERFORCE reveals distinct differences in their targeted use cases.
The XTREME WATERFORCE is the more budget-friendly option, costing approximately $105 (9%) less than the XLR8 Gaming VERTO EPIC-X.
For high-resolution textures and creative workloads, the XLR8 Gaming VERTO EPIC-X has the advantage with 4GB more VRAM.
Builders with compact cases should consider the XTREME WATERFORCE, which is significantly shorter.