Compare GPUs
Share Comparison
| GPU | ![]() $86281 | ![]() $1,48999 |
|---|---|---|
Base Clock | 1920 MHz | 2210 MHz |
Boost Clock | 2625 MHz | 2565 MHz |
Bus | PCI Express 4.0 | PCI Express 4.0 |
Chipset Manufacturer | NVIDIA | NVIDIA |
Color | White | Black |
Cooling | 3 Fans | 3 Fans |
CUDA Cores | 5888 | 10240 |
DisplayPort 1.4a Outputs | 3 | 3 |
Frame Gen | DLSS Frame Generation | DLSS Frame Generation |
Frame Sync | GSYNC | GSYNC |
GPU | GeForce RTX 4070 | GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER |
HDMI 2.1a Outputs | 1 | 1 |
HDMI 2.1b Outputs | 1 | 1 |
Bus | PCIe x16 | PCIe x16 |
Length | 307 mm | 340 mm |
Memory Type | GDDR6X | GDDR6X |
PCIe 12VHPWR | 1 | 1 |
Series | GeForce RTX 40 | GeForce RTX 40 |
Slot Size | 3 | 3 |
TDP | 215W | 320W |
Upscaling | DLSS 4.5 | DLSS 4.5 |
VRAM | 12 GB | 16 GB |
Part Number | RTX 4070 GAMING X SLIM WHITE 12GGeForce RTX 4070 GAMING X SLIM WHITE 12G912-V513-274V513-274R | VCG4080S16TFXPB1-O |
Comparison Analysis
Comparing the GAMING X SLIM vs VERTO OC reveals distinct differences in their targeted use cases.
The GAMING X SLIM is the more budget-friendly option, costing approximately $627 (73%) less than the VERTO OC.
For high-resolution textures and creative workloads, the VERTO OC has the advantage with 4GB more VRAM.
Builders with compact cases should consider the GAMING X SLIM, which is significantly shorter.

