Compare GPUs
Share Comparison
| GPU |  $39899 | XFX $35999 |
|---|---|---|
Base Clock | 1515 MHz | 2150 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1815 MHz | 2600 MHz |
Bus | PCI Express 3.0 | PCI Express 4.0 |
Chipset Manufacturer | NVIDIA | AMD |
Color | Black | Black |
Cooling | 2 Fans | 3 Fans |
CUDA Cores | - | 2560 |
DisplayPort 1.4a Outputs | 3 | 3 |
Frame Sync | GSYNC | FreeSync |
GPU | GeForce RTX 2080 | Radeon RX 6750 XT |
HDMI 2.0 Outputs | 1 | 0 |
HDMI 2.1a Outputs | 0 | 1 |
HDMI 2.1b Outputs | 0 | 1 |
Bus | PCIe x16 | PCIe x16 |
Length | 270 mm | 323 mm |
Memory Bandwidth | 14 Gbps | 18 Gbps |
Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
Series | GeForce RTX 20 | Radeon RX 6000 |
Slot Size | 3 | 3 |
TDP | 215W | 250W |
Upscaling | DLSS 4.5 | FSR 3.1 |
VRAM | 8 GB | 12 GB |
Part Number | 08G-P4-2183-KR | RX-675XYJFDP |
Comparison Analysis
Comparing the XC ULTRA GAMING vs Speedster QICK 319 Core reveals distinct differences in their targeted use cases.
The Speedster QICK 319 Core is the more budget-friendly option, costing approximately $39 (11%) less than the XC ULTRA GAMING.
For high-resolution textures and creative workloads, the Speedster QICK 319 Core has the advantage with 4GB more VRAM.
Builders with compact cases should consider the XC ULTRA GAMING, which is significantly shorter.