Compare GPUs
Share Comparison
| GPU |  $44468 | XFX $35999 |
|---|---|---|
Base Clock | 1626 MHz | 2150 MHz |
Boost Clock | 2491 MHz | 2600 MHz |
Bus | PCI Express 4.0 | PCI Express 4.0 |
Chipset Manufacturer | AMD | AMD |
Color | Black | Black |
Cooling | 2 Fans | 3 Fans |
CUDA Cores | 1792 | 2560 |
DisplayPort 1.4a Outputs | 3 | 3 |
Frame Sync | FreeSync | FreeSync |
GPU | Radeon RX 6600 | Radeon RX 6750 XT |
HDMI 2.1a Outputs | 1 | 1 |
HDMI 2.1b Outputs | 1 | 1 |
Bus | - | PCIe x16 |
Length | 193 mm | 323 mm |
Memory Bandwidth | - | 18 Gbps |
Memory Clock | 1750 | 0 |
Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
PCIe 8-Pin | 1 | 0 |
Series | Radeon RX 6000 | Radeon RX 6000 |
Slot Size | 0 | 3 |
TDP | 140W | 250W |
Upscaling | FSR 3.1 | FSR 3.1 |
VRAM | 8 GB | 12 GB |
Part Number | 11310-01-20G | RX-675XYJFDP |
Comparison Analysis
Comparing the PULSE vs Speedster QICK 319 Core reveals distinct differences in their targeted use cases.
The Speedster QICK 319 Core is the more budget-friendly option, costing approximately $85 (24%) less than the PULSE.
For high-resolution textures and creative workloads, the Speedster QICK 319 Core has the advantage with 4GB more VRAM.
Builders with compact cases should consider the PULSE, which is significantly shorter.