Compare GPUs
Share Comparison
| GPU |  $44899 | KFA2 $79100 |
|---|---|---|
Base Clock | 1410 MHz | 2310 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1680 MHz | 2655 MHz |
Bus | PCI Express 4.0 | PCI Express 4.0 |
Chipset Manufacturer | NVIDIA | NVIDIA |
Color | Black | Black |
Cooling | 2 Fans | 2 Fans |
CUDA Cores | 0 | 4352 |
DisplayPort 1.4a Outputs | 1 | 3 |
Frame Gen | - | DLSS Frame Generation |
Frame Sync | GSYNC | GSYNC |
GPU | GeForce GTX 1650 | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti |
HDMI 2.0 Outputs | 1 | 0 |
HDMI 2.1a Outputs | 0 | 1 |
HDMI 2.1b Outputs | 0 | 1 |
Bus | PCIe x16 | PCIe x16 |
Length | 204 mm | 251 mm |
Memory Bandwidth | 12 Gbps | - |
Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
PCIe 8-Pin | 0 | 1 |
Series | GeForce GTX 1650 G6 | GeForce RTX 40 |
Slot Size | 3 | 2 |
TDP | 75W | 165W |
Upscaling | DLSS 4.5 | DLSS 4.5 |
VRAM | 4 GB | 8 GB |
Part Number | TUF-GTX1650-O4GD6-GAMING90YV0EH0-M0NA00 | 46ISL8MD8AEK |
Comparison Analysis
Comparing the TUF GAMING OC vs EX reveals distinct differences in their targeted use cases.
The TUF GAMING OC is the more budget-friendly option, costing approximately $342 (76%) less than the EX.
For high-resolution textures and creative workloads, the EX has the advantage with 4GB more VRAM.
Builders with compact cases should consider the TUF GAMING OC, which is significantly shorter.