Compare GPUs
Share Comparison
| GPU |  $44899 |  $45999 |
|---|---|---|
Base Clock | 1410 MHz | 2220 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1680 MHz | 2220 MHz |
Bus | PCI Express 4.0 | PCI Express 4.0 |
Chipset Manufacturer | NVIDIA | AMD |
Color | Black | Black |
Cooling | 2 Fans | 3 Fans |
CUDA Cores | 0 | 2048 |
DisplayPort 1.4a Outputs | 1 | 0 |
DisplayPort 2.1a Outputs | 0 | 2 |
Frame Sync | GSYNC | FreeSync |
GPU | GeForce GTX 1650 | Radeon RX 9060 XT 16 GB |
HDMI 2.0 Outputs | 1 | 0 |
HDMI 2.1a Outputs | 0 | 1 |
HDMI 2.1b Outputs | 0 | 1 |
Bus | PCIe x16 | PCIe x16 |
Length | 204 mm | 281 mm |
Memory Bandwidth | 12 Gbps | - |
Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
Series | GeForce GTX 1650 G6 | Radeon RX 9000 |
Slot Size | 3 | 2 |
TDP | 75W | 160W |
Upscaling | DLSS 4.5 | FSR 4 |
VRAM | 4 GB | 16 GB |
Part Number | TUF-GTX1650-O4GD6-GAMING90YV0EH0-M0NA00 | GV-R9060XTGAMING OC-16GD |
Comparison Analysis
Comparing the TUF GAMING OC vs GAMING OC reveals distinct differences in their targeted use cases.
Both components are priced similarly, making the choice dependent on specific features rather than budget.
For high-resolution textures and creative workloads, the GAMING OC has the advantage with 12GB more VRAM.
Builders with compact cases should consider the TUF GAMING OC, which is significantly shorter.